WILDLIFE > PRESERVATION

Pro and Anti-Whaling Nations Fail to Reach Agreement

No peace for the whales

The current membership of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) is almost evenly divided between whaling and non-whaling nations, resulting in a political deadlock which makes it extremely difficult to secure the 3/4 majority of votes needed to enact change. As talks stall, commercial whaling practices continue to take place and increase yearly without any international control and many species of whales are on the brink of extinction. According to Save the Whales:

· The Gray whale in the North Atlantic is extinct.

· The Indus Susu, or Indian River dolphin, is barely hanging onto its shrunken habitat.

· The European stock of Bowhead whales, between east Greenland and Novaya Zemba, is almost extinct.

· The Northern Pacific Right whales, the Korean stock of Gray whales, and the Cochito, or Gulf of California porpoise may soon be gone.

The BBC reported that a source close to the talks blamed Japan for holding up the progress, because it won’t agree to large enough cuts in its annual “scientific” Antarctic hunt. At a meeting held last month in San Francisco, Japan offered to cut its target level to 650 minke whales, 29 less than were caught last year. Japan also said at the meeting that in return for this concession, it wants to set a small annual quota of 150 whales for four of its coastal villages, where whaling has traditionally been practiced and is part of the culture’s heritage.

Environmental groups are not in support of this request because there is no way to monitor how the whale hunting is conducted, as it mostly takes place in waters where international ships have no jurisdiction.

Japan, Norway and Iceland want to continue whaling on as large a scale as possible and all three countries are exploiting loopholes in the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling in order to kill nearly 2,000 whales each year, even though there has been global moratorium on commercial whaling since 1982. Exemptions to this can occur if a nation objects to the law, like Norway; a nation claims the hunt is done for scientific purposes, like Japan; or an aboriginal group is granted permission by the IWC for subsistence-level hunting.

The World Wildlife Fund is one environmental organization that is lobbying to bring whale hunting under the strict control of the IWC and wants the group to expand its scope to address other human activities that threaten the whales in order to ensure the survival of our most threatened species.

Source: BecauseAction.com

COMMENT ON ARTICLE
by Judy Malone
I watch Whale Wars every chance I get and have done so repeatedly. But, the last two episodes of Whale Wars that shows the Japanese Whalers killing whales right in front of the world filmed from the bow of the Steve Irwin Sea Shepherd on national tv. This blows me total off the scope of 'HOW IS THIS HAPPENING????" They were in the WHALE SANCTUARY in Antarctic below the 70th parallel. OFF LIMITS TO ALL HUNTING. SOMEONE PLEASE WRITE THIS IN JAPANESE SO THEY WILL KNOW. NO MATTER THEY ALREADY KNOW. OFF LIMITS STARTS WITH THEM AND THEIR SO CALLED SCIENCE PROJECTS! $1000.00 A POUND OF WHALE MEAT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE SCIENCE TO ME, IT IS ROBBERY, STEALING, UNBELIEVEABLY UNETHICAL BY THE NATIONS OF #1 JAPAN. BELIEVE ME AND TRUST ME WHEN I SAY I WILL NEVER EVER BUY ONE THING WITH JAPAN'S NAME ON IT OR NORWAY OR ANY OTHER THIEF AND LIAR NATION. WHAT SCIENTIC MATTER IS IN QUESTION: HOW MANY KILLS DOES IT TAKE TO WIPE OUT AN ENTIRE SPECIES OF MAMMAL. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WHALES AND US IS SOMEONE GOES TO JAIL IF A MAMMAL(HUMAN MAN, WOMAN OR CHILD ). THEY NEED AIR TO LIVE, AND WATER TO DRINK, THEY MATE JUST LIKE WE DO ONLY THEY DON'T WASTE LIFE OR USE LIFE FOR MONEY. THEY HARM NO ONE. JAPAN, NORWAY AND WHO EVER ELSE IS KILLING THESE CREATURES (WHO DO ABSOLUTELY NO HARM TO ANYONE OR ANYTHING) SHOULD BE STOPPED AND JAILED BEFORE SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE WHALE IS KILLED. WHAT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION ARE THEY KILLING THEM FOR? I AND A MILLION OF OTHERS WANT TO KNOW. WHAT ARE THE JAPS KILLING FOR?
by Wynnie
Hey lyflovr! I love your way of thinking--we should phase out barbaric practices. God gave man control of this land and all of God's beautiful creatures and look at how we squander the land and brutalize the creatures. So so sad.
by Wynnie
I agree with you Linda. What sense does it make to ask the perpetrators how they want to be punished? Great analogy! :)
by Linda
"PRO_Whaling Nations don't agree? Isn't that like asking child molesters to agree on their punishment?
by lyflovr (LIFE LOVER)
Obviously the IWC is not capable of writing or enforcing this important protection. Their very name indicates their purpose is to regulate "whaling" not to protect whales. Thats like asking a tobacco company to help stop smoking. If "scientific" hunting of whales is allowed, then a report of SIGNIFICANT scientific data should accompany the killing of EACH whale. and should be within the confines of a specific scientific project that has limits, goals, results and a CONCLUSION. Countries should not be able to DISOBEY international LAW just because they don't agree, The ONLY excuse that is valid is for certain aboriginal peoples that CANNOT survive or adapt and MUST hunt whale to survive, and this should be limited to a per capita quota for personal use, which should be phased out ASAP, by caring organisations or governments that can offer attractive alteratives. THIS STORY should have been from the archives of the 1950's. WHALING should be a forgotten word in our vocabulary, much the same as SLAVERY. As we become civilized, we should abandon barbaric ways, DONTCHA THINK??

SUBSCRIBE TO THE WILDLIFE PETITION

MOREBY TOPIC